0.06/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.14	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.14/0.35	% Computer   : n021.cluster.edu
0.14/0.35	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.35	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.35	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.14/0.35	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.35	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 13:42:40 EDT 2021
0.14/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.36	% Number of cores: 8
0.14/0.36	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.14/0.36	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.14/0.37	# No SInE strategy applied
0.14/0.37	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
59.20/59.44	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S0V
59.20/59.44	# and selection function PSelectComplexExceptRRHorn.
59.20/59.44	#
59.20/59.44	# Preprocessing time       : 0.069 s
59.29/59.57	# No success with AutoSched0
59.29/59.57	# Trying AutoSched1 for 26 seconds
85.24/85.62	# AutoSched1-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
85.24/85.62	# and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
85.24/85.62	#
85.24/85.62	# Preprocessing time       : 0.069 s
85.24/85.62	# Presaturation interreduction done
85.44/85.75	# No success with AutoSched1
85.44/85.75	# Trying AutoSched2 for 8 seconds
85.46/85.92	# AutoSched2-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S08CI
85.46/85.92	# and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
85.46/85.92	#
85.46/85.92	# Preprocessing time       : 0.068 s
85.46/85.92	# Presaturation interreduction done
85.46/85.92	
85.46/85.92	# Proof found!
85.46/85.92	# SZS status Theorem
85.46/85.92	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
85.46/85.92	thf(fact_102_dual__order_Ostrict__trans1, axiom, ![X6:nat, X5:nat, X7:nat]:(ord_less_eq_nat @ X6 @ X5=>(ord_less_nat @ X7 @ X6=>ord_less_nat @ X7 @ X5)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_102_dual__order_Ostrict__trans1)).
85.46/85.92	thf(conj_2, conjecture, ![X51:nat]:(~(ord_less_nat @ X51 @ (size_size_list_a @ xs))|(nth_a @ xs @ X51)=(nth_a @ ys @ X51)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_2)).
85.46/85.92	thf(conj_1, hypothesis, ord_less_eq_nat @ (size_size_list_a @ xs) @ (size_size_list_a @ ys), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_1)).
85.46/85.92	thf(fact_3_i__append__nth1, axiom, ![X3:nat, X56:list_a, X57:nat > a]:(ord_less_nat @ X3 @ (size_size_list_a @ X56)=>(listIn1312259492pend_a @ X56 @ X57 @ X3)=(nth_a @ X56 @ X3)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_3_i__append__nth1)).
85.46/85.92	thf(conj_0, hypothesis, ![X20:nat]:(listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f @ X20)=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ ys @ g @ X20), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1272:nat, X1273:nat, X1274:nat]:(~ord_less_eq_nat @ X1272 @ X1273|(~ord_less_nat @ X1274 @ X1272|ord_less_nat @ X1274 @ X1273)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_102_dual__order_Ostrict__trans1])])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(![X51:nat]:(~ord_less_nat @ X51 @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)|(nth_a @ xs @ X51)=(nth_a @ ys @ X51))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_2])])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X3:nat, X2:nat, X1:nat]:(ord_less_nat @ X3 @ X2|~ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X2|~ord_less_nat @ X3 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_8, hypothesis, ord_less_eq_nat @ (size_size_list_a @ xs) @ (size_size_list_a @ ys), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (ord_less_nat @ esk41_0 @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)&(nth_a @ xs @ esk41_0)!=(nth_a @ ys @ esk41_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1045:nat, X1046:list_a, X1047:nat > a]:(~ord_less_nat @ X1045 @ (size_size_list_a @ X1046)|(listIn1312259492pend_a @ X1046 @ X1047 @ X1045)=(nth_a @ X1046 @ X1045)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_3_i__append__nth1])])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_11, hypothesis, ![X1:nat]:(ord_less_nat @ X1 @ (size_size_list_a @ ys)|~ord_less_nat @ X1 @ (size_size_list_a @ xs)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ord_less_nat @ esk41_0 @ (size_size_list_a @ xs), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_13, hypothesis, ![X1579:nat]:(listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f @ X1579)=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ ys @ g @ X1579), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[conj_0])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X1:nat, X29:nat > a, X23:list_a]:((listIn1312259492pend_a @ X23 @ X29 @ X1)=(nth_a @ X23 @ X1)|~ord_less_nat @ X1 @ (size_size_list_a @ X23)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ord_less_nat @ esk41_0 @ (size_size_list_a @ ys), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_16, hypothesis, ![X1:nat]:(listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ f @ X1)=(listIn1312259492pend_a @ ys @ g @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X29:nat > a]:(listIn1312259492pend_a @ ys @ X29 @ esk41_0)=(nth_a @ ys @ esk41_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X29:nat > a]:(listIn1312259492pend_a @ xs @ X29 @ esk41_0)=(nth_a @ xs @ esk41_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_12])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (nth_a @ xs @ esk41_0)!=(nth_a @ ys @ esk41_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
85.46/85.92	thf(c_0_20, hypothesis, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), c_0_18]), c_0_19]), ['proof']).
85.46/85.92	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
85.46/85.92	# Proof object total steps             : 21
85.46/85.92	# Proof object clause steps            : 11
85.46/85.92	# Proof object formula steps           : 10
85.46/85.92	# Proof object conjectures             : 8
85.46/85.92	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
85.46/85.92	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
85.46/85.92	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
85.46/85.92	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
85.46/85.92	# Proof object generating inferences   : 5
85.46/85.92	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
85.46/85.92	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
85.46/85.92	# Parsed axioms                        : 282
85.46/85.92	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
85.46/85.92	# Initial clauses                      : 689
85.46/85.92	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 47
85.46/85.92	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 642
85.46/85.92	# Processed clauses                    : 1316
85.46/85.92	# ...of these trivial                  : 35
85.46/85.92	# ...subsumed                          : 266
85.46/85.92	# ...remaining for further processing  : 1014
85.46/85.92	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 68
85.46/85.92	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
85.46/85.92	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
85.46/85.92	# Backward-rewritten                   : 2
85.46/85.92	# Generated clauses                    : 3169
85.46/85.92	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2775
85.46/85.92	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
85.46/85.92	# Paramodulations                      : 3082
85.46/85.92	# Factorizations                       : 4
85.46/85.92	# NegExts                              : 0
85.46/85.92	# Equation resolutions                 : 73
85.46/85.92	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional check models        : 0
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
85.46/85.92	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
85.46/85.92	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
85.46/85.92	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
85.46/85.92	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
85.46/85.92	# Current number of processed clauses  : 507
85.46/85.92	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 113
85.46/85.92	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
85.46/85.92	#    Negative unit clauses             : 201
85.46/85.92	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 192
85.46/85.92	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2535
85.46/85.92	# ...number of literals in the above   : 5614
85.46/85.92	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
85.46/85.92	# Current number of archived clauses   : 447
85.46/85.92	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 70714
85.46/85.92	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18712
85.46/85.92	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 199
85.46/85.92	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4756
85.46/85.92	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
85.46/85.92	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 50
85.46/85.92	# BW rewrite match successes           : 8
85.46/85.92	# Condensation attempts                : 0
85.46/85.92	# Condensation successes               : 0
85.46/85.92	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 110658
85.46/85.92	
85.46/85.92	# -------------------------------------------------
85.46/85.92	# User time                : 83.005 s
85.46/85.92	# System time              : 2.435 s
85.46/85.92	# Total time               : 85.440 s
85.46/85.92	# Maximum resident set size: 2084 pages
85.46/85.92	EOF